Turn the CRA and monitoring plan into the compliance record you run.
Policies, controls, the risk assessment, the monitoring plan, actions and management information become one operating record. Klavius reads the documents you supply and proposes the work, with the source shown. Your officers decide and sign off.
Five documents, no current compliance view.
Start with the compliance baseline.
For the functions we agree on and the documents you supply, thirty days is enough to stand up four things, in the platform, reviewed by your officers.
A mapped control library
The Klavius-certified controls mapped to your agreed scope, nothing generic left in.
A CRA and CMP draft for review
Prepared from your documents, every recommendation visibly sourced. Officers adjust, accept or reject.
A live operating calendar
The recurring monitoring and compliance tasks, scheduled and owned.
An exportable management view
What the board and a reviewer receive, drawn from the agreed records.
Proposed, sourced, and yours to overrule.
Every assessment Klavius proposes shows its inputs: the policy it read, the control it relies on, the prior period. An officer can accept, adjust or reject it, and the record keeps the trail. No opaque conclusions, no scores without sources.
Klavius proposes. Your officers decide.
Scope
The entity, functions, documents and current CRA/CMP we start from. You name the owners.
Read and propose
Klavius reads the supplied documents, maps the control library and drafts the CRA and CMP, sources shown.
Validate
Officers review, adjust and sign off. Nothing becomes the record without them.
Run the cycle
Controls execute on their cadence, actions carry owners, and the record stays current between refreshes.
One record, upstream and downstream.
CRA tools tend to produce a document and stop. In Klavius, the compliance record is one face of the same oversight system your second line already runs.
Upstream, the watch feeds the record
New CSSF, ESMA and EC publications land in Regulatory Watch. The relevant ones become control proposals, for an officer to review into this same record.
Regulatory Watch →Downstream, the same record reports
Management information, Delegate Oversight and DORA draw on the same connected record where the same provider, control or incident is relevant.
Delegate Oversight →For your ICT and security review.
EU-hosted, tenant-isolated, and a tamper-evident trail behind every decision the platform makes. Everything your vendor assessment needs is published, in plain terms.
Bring the current process. Leave with a clearer baseline.
A working session with a founder, on a redacted example or your own document format, not on a deck. We define the scope together, you see the product run, and you leave knowing exactly what your officers would review.